Resending to list-only with less attachments: On Tuesday 07 June 2005 18:21, Nix wrote: > On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] gibbered uncontrollably: > > On Tuesday 07 June 2005 17:54, Nix wrote: > >> On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > >> > On Tuesday 07 June 2005 16:31, Nix wrote: > >> >> On Tue, 07 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] gibbered uncontrollably:
> >> Well, I've got a dual non-NPTL glibc in /lib and NPTL glibc in /lib/tls, > >> but I can force use of either, > > > > Even for static linking? In this case, strange setup. > Yes. > OK, so it's a -static TT build that's failing? Exactly. > Will try. > > >> and the headers, > > > > Different headers too? I didn't know that (and it makes me suspicious > > about binary compatibility). > > Yeah, the headers differ. There *are* some binary compatibility > problems, mostly in the area of thread cancellation, but in that case > Ulrich would probably say that build-against-NPTL-run-against-LinuxThreads > is not officially supported for much the same reason as build-against- > 2.3.5-run-against-2.2.4 is unsupported... > > >> This is > >> <http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade/patches/guest/uml-2.6.11.8 > >>-bs 6/uml-2.6.11.8-bs6.patch.bz2>, right? > > Not sure about that... I uploaded and destroyed it multiple times, so > > here's the MD5 of the current version: > > md5sum uml-2.6.11.8-bs6.patch.bz2 > > 1a6868d70c7af75f3375eba3b7dfd466 uml-2.6.11.8-bs6.patch.bz2 > That matches the MD5 of that patch. (The one wot doesn't work. ;} See > other mail.) > Patch mis-rolled, I guess: arch/um/scripts/Makefile.rules is missing, > yet included from multiple places: Not only that, dear boy, not only that... I now looked combinediff: hunk-splitting is required in this case, but is not yet implemented combinediff: use the -U option to work around this combinediff: Bad patch #1: Illegal seek Seems like I'll have to resort to something bad... which is attached, i.e. black magic (using -U from time to time). Alternatively, use patch1.bz2 and patch2.bz2, which have normal context (the final patch has been generated by merging them). > >>(It looks like it was uploaded only a few minutes ago in some time > >>zone quite divergent from either of ours. :) ) > > Hmm, the first upload was done during this night, so I guess it was not a > > timezone problem but an actual crazy boy fixing sucking compile errors at > > a late time. > Gosh, I can't imagine anyone here doing anything like that. > [fixed one bug in a local administrative script at 04:00 this morning... > insomnia sucks, hay fever sucks, temperatures above 15C suck...] I share with you insomnia and hay fever (if I do the right guess). For temperatures above 15C, I don't: I live in Sicily, so here we're at about 25°-30° C, and it'll go up to 40°C... -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
patch1.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
patch2.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
pgp3mgrv7bkCq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
