I just let the SIGSEVG go and return from the sleeping_process_signal function instead of tracer_panic and hanging the UML. It seems ok. Is it dangerous? Thanks a lot!
Alex -----Original Message----- From: Blaisorblade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 11:42 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Alex LIU Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Question about the unexpected signal 11 when fork in UML-2.6.7 TT mode On Tuesday 21 June 2005 12:05, Alex LIU wrote: > Hi,all: > > When I fork() in UML TT mode,it always said "the sleeping process xxx > received unexpedted signal 11" and the UML hang...before fork I also > set the signal handler... My UML is 2.6.7 and I used TT mode.Thanks a > lot! > Alex Have you a good reason to use UML 2.6.7? We can't know by heart the list of all fixed bugs in previous UML releases, really, and you'll be doing yourself a favor by upgrading to 2.6.11-bs5 or 2.6.12 (which contains almost everything from -bs). That said, you are talking about userspace code, right? It's anyway strange that your system boots but you can't write a simple code that fork()'s. -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
