Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Friday 01 July 2005 23:58, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This patch implements something very close to skas mode for hosts > > > which don't support skas - I'm calling this skas0. > > > > I note that this patch assumes that > > uml-kill-some-useless-vmalloc-tlb-flushing.patch is applied. > > You're fixing the conflict anyway since it's little, correct?
Well I can fix the reject if we decide that uml-kill-some-useless-vmalloc-tlb-flushing.patch is not to be applied, but it seems that there's no need. > However, for now it seems that I can't reproduce anyway the iptables crash, > and even Jeff did some testing... so it seems it's ok. OK.. Now what about uml-remove-winch-sem.patch? I have a "keep this in -mm" sign next to it. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
