On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 01:01:33PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> diff -puN arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c~uml-fix-for-gcc4-lvalue
> arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c
> --- linux-2.6.git/arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c~uml-fix-for-gcc4-lvalue
> 2005-07-09 13:01:03.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.git-paolo/arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c 2005-07-09
> 13:01:03.000000000 +0200
> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ int setup_signal_stack_si(unsigned long
>
> frame = (struct rt_sigframe __user *)
> round_down(stack_top - sizeof(struct rt_sigframe), 16) - 8;
> - ((unsigned char *) frame) -= 128;
> + frame -= 128 / sizeof(frame);
Are you sure these two are identical?
The above code fragment looks suspicious anyway, particularly:
frame = (struct rt_sigframe __user *)
round_down(stack_top - sizeof(struct rt_sigframe), 16) - 8;
which will put the frame at 8 * sizeof(struct rt_sigframe) below
the point which round_down() would return (which would be 1 struct
rt_sigframe below stack_top, rounded down).
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening
July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP,
AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
