You talked about the usage of the host scheduler for correct resource sharing between UMLs (i.e. an UML in TT/SKAS0 mode should not get more time for each process it has).
Well, I think that the CKRM project has done exactly something which would be useful for this purpose, it's already working, they're actively maintaining it and it may be merged soon (at least, it seems they're trying to do this). Yes, with that project it's the host admin which must define the UML cpu share (at least I guess, but this may prove false), but that sounds reasonable... what do you think? -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
