> > There's none, but vanilla 2.6.10 has included UML support; I=20 > > wouldn't call=20 > > that trustworthy (especially from the "security" point of view). > >=20 > > The amount of patches which went in for UML before 2.6.11 was=20 > > released was so=20 > > big, and they were so heavy, I never got around to releasing=20 > > a -bs patch for=20 > > that. > >=20 > > That said, why do you need 2.6.10?=20 > > The kernel in-house we run our apps on is 2.6.10, and therefore I > would > like to create a UML based on that. > Would it possible to provide a bs patch for 2.6.10 If you're talking about the host kernel, you should still be able to use a 2.6.13+ kernel as guest on a 2.6.10 host. Running anything older is a foolish (for the guest and only slightly less so for the host - unless you have many bugfixes backported for that kernel version by your vendor), you are missing out on numerous bug fixes and not likely to find a sympathetic ear if you do encounter a real bug.
Antoine ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
