Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:20:20PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > sysrq t is broken (and stays), 
> 
> There's a fix on the way for that.  This has nothing to do with interrupt
> context anyway.
> 
> > but additionally there are some warnings from 
> > some commands (enable sleep inside spinlock checking and spinlock 
> > debugging), 
> > which go to the down_read inside handle_page_fault IIRC. So try to run in 
> > process context.
> 
> Which ones?  They should be fixed.
> 
> It is fairly fundamental to sysrq that it work from interrupt context.  You
> may be diagnosing a system which can't context switch any more.
> 
> This patch should be dropped, and the real problems fixed.
> 

Well Linus has just merged this patch.  If you hadn't removed me from the
cc yesterday this would not have happened.



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Reply via email to