On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 12:39:59AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 January 2006 15:14, wang lianwei wrote:
> (What happened to these bad "*" guys ;-) ? )
Yeah, this would have been better expressed as a patch.
> > total_len = phys_len + iomem_len + highmem_len;
>
> Remember people: never compare apples with bananas (or whatever).
Yup, sometimes I wish we had strongly typed integers...
> Thanks for
> the note. It's the first patch on my queue.
OK, I was going to fix it here, but I'll just let you send it in.
Does this fix the 2M iomem problem?
Jeff
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
