On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 08:14:50AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: Hi Matt, > On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:02:40PM +0100, Stefano Melchior wrote: > > Once discovered the issue and find the workaround [1], I am wondering why, > > if you moved uml_net from /usr/bin to /usr/lib/uml/, you left the other > > uml_* executable on the first dir. > > This was to comply with the FHS: > > http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html > > uml_net is not intended to be executed by a user, only invoked as an > auxiliary program by UML itself. > > I discussed this with Jeff at the time, and he agreed that it should move, > but never moved it upstream apparently. > > I patched the Debian UML sources to match. > > > Is it worthy to move all of them to /usr/lib/uml/? > > No, see above.
Ok, I understood, thank you. On the Makefile of uml_net source, and I read: BIN_DIR ?= /usr/bin If Jeff, Paolo and the UML devel team all agree, we can patch it and transform the line in: BIN_DIR ?= /usr/lib/uml The same with uml_switch, isn't it? Do you agree? Cheers SteX -- Stefano Melchior, GPG key = D52DF829 - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://etinarcadiaego.dyndns.org -- http://www.stex.name Skype ID "stefanomelchior"
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
