> For UML, instead, it's important to set that some peculiar syscalls are not 
> traced, that the mask is 1-extended and that errors are reported.
> 
> So, I suggest a "flags" parameter for this. Sadly, we're using the ptrace() 
> syscall and there's no 5th argument normally, we could either use it (IIRC 
> some calls use the 5th regs indeed), or pass as "data" a struct with flags 
> and the mask.
> 
> The flags could be:
> 
> MASK_DEFAULT_TRACE (set the default to 1 for remaining bits)
> MASK_DEFAULT_IGNORE (set the default to 0 for remaining bits)
> MASK_STRICT_VERIFY (return -EINVAL for bits exceeding NR_syscalls and set 
> differently than the default).
> 
> probably with a reasonable prefix to avoid namespace pollution (something 
> like 
> "PT_SC_-").

You might as well introduce yet another ptrace call which returns the number
of system calls and for this ptrace call force user space to pass a complete
bitmap. Sounds easier to me.

> > The tracing process won't see 
> > any of the non existant syscalls it requested to see anyway.
> No, you misunderstood the code, it does the opposite very different - the 
> loop 

Looks I missed a few "!"s :)


-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Reply via email to