On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 02:25:00AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> That patch should probably be separated, from the rest.
> But it looks like a fairly sane idea.
Yeah, I'll keep these together for now, but the ptrace one is
conceptually different from the rest.
> I think you missed a couple essential things to a time namespace.
> Timers. The posix timers, in particular. The worst
> of those is the monotonic timer.
Oops, thanks for pointing that out.
> In the case of migration the ugly case to properly handle is the
> monotonic timer. That needs an offset yet it is absolutely forbidden
> to provide that offset from the inside. So this is the one namespace
> that I think is inappropriate to use sys_unshare to create.
> We need a system call so that we can specify the minimum or the
> starting monotonic time base.
For migration, it looks like the container will have to specify the
time base at creation so that everything in it will have a consistent
view of time if they get moved around.
So, maybe it belongs in clone as a "backwards" flag similar to
CLONE_NEWNS.
Jeff
-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
