On Wednesday 03 May 2006 16:42, Jeff Dike wrote: > Do we really need to pull that into the UML Kconfig? We need some of > the things it defines, like X86_CMPXCHG, but people keep discovering > that menu and trying to set it to match the host, causing compilation > problems when that pulls in headers that UML doesn't have.
Yes, I didn't fix these problems. I've been fairly lazy, I must admit this. > I think I would like to dump Kconfig.cpu and define for ourselves the > symbols that we need. How do you let the user choose the CPU he wants to optimize for? That was the first purpose of what I did - optimizing for 386 isn't exactly the best thing to do (and we've done this, till the menu was introduced). We can restrict the choices in the menu, for now, with a dependency on ! UML for the ones which don't work (i.e. the ones using 3DNow in string operations, IIRC). M686, Athlon and likely Pentium 4 work at least. -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
