On Friday 04 August 2006 15:00, alessandro salvatori wrote: > Jeff, > > the new lock irq_lock is still static, but we now have preprocessor > macros to be included from a header file
Are you talking about spin_lock_irqsave & co? In that case you have maybe missed that the removed functions were simply wrappers for spin_lock_irqsave. Those wrappers existed to be used in files which can't include kernel headers (long story). > instead of non-static functions in > the same module as the static irq_lock. > Am I missing something? -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
