On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 09:19:17PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Sunday 24 September 2006 13:46, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > Hello Paolo,
> >
> > with the following change the patch applies and hopefully works, still
> > building here but mm/fremap.o is done so I'm quite optimistic :) (__prot
> > is used in the code, not prot).
> Ok, ok, I'm doing a production release... (I used some freedom in that one, 
> since it was a developer release). Or better, two production releases.
> One normal one, and another with full RFP support.

great! thanks

> As explained in the news page, the patch _requires_ the separate 
> Remap_File_Pages patch (it was an experimental release); I should have 

ooops :) it seems it's my time to "doh!"... /me is too lazy sometimes, I
had your archive bookmarked and just took the first 2.6.18-something I
saw.

> suggested that you can simply split away the last patch in series to remove 
> the dependency. Plus some requested fixups on configuration items (deprecate 
> TT mode for instance).
> 
> Additionally, I'm releasing -bb1: quite a lot of improvements for locking, 
> especially on UBD, but also on UML networking drivers, and on helpers 
> execution, and experimental TLS x86_64 support.

this is great, TLS/64 is what is keeping me from supplying amd64 UML
images for debian. I'll probably try to get the patch there and finally
push amd64 images.

thanks again
-- 
mattia
:wq!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Reply via email to