On Thu, September 28, 2006 10:19 pm, Petter Reinholdtsen said: > [Mattia Dongili] >> Well, I'd actually prefer if you could remove the noexec flag from >> /dev/shm. I understand the security reasons given in the bugreport >> but I'd prefer avoid having to deal with one more Debian-only (is >> it?) thing given the soon to come general freeze. > > I am considering this for etch only, and to reinsert it once etch is > released. I suspect it is better to break uml, dosemu and others > misusing /dev/shm/ early in the etch+1 release cycle instead of late > in the etch cycle.
absolutely seconded. > But I might be too late, as base and sysvinit is already frozen, > according to the email from Andreas. :( We will have to discuss it > with the release managers, I guess. I can still file a critical bug because sysvinit "breaks unrelated SW" :) Let's submit the question to d-release then. -- mattia :wq! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
