Jeff Dike wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 06:36:15PM +0000, Antoine Martin wrote: >> Just caught this in `dmesg` >> >> [42977596.520000] Adding 131064k swap on /dev/ubdb. Priority:-1 >> extents:1 across:131064k >> [42980169.290000] do_syscall_stub : ret = -12, offset = 548682067984, >> data = 0000000060b16010 >> [42980169.290000] do_syscall_stub: syscall 9 failed, return value = >> 0xfffffffffffffff4, expected return value = 0x477a000 >> [42980169.290000] syscall parameters: 0x477a000 0x1000 0x7 0x11 0x3 >> 0xad0c000 >> [42980169.290000] fix_range_common: failed, killing current process >> >> Whilst trying to compile gcc (big beast) on a 64-bit UML instance. >> Earlier it had failed and triggered OOM, which is why I added the swap, >> now it may still not have enough (compilation crashed in a similar >> manner) but this time there is no OOM message. >> >> Any ideas what this is? > > Sounds like it might be the host /proc/sys/vm/max_map_count being > exceeded, which will happen with a UML process with 256M RSS. Indeed it was (never heard of it before)
Thanks! Antoine ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel