On Friday 16 February 2007 20:02, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 08:05:56PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: > > Jeff, I verified my patch is _almost_ enough for 2.6.18 for fully booting > > a 32bit UML; on 2.6.18 I had to also add PTRACE_GET/SET_THREAD_AREA (this > > fix was merged in 2.6.19) to avoid tons of TLS errors. > > I'm not seeing that. With the current set of patches, I have 32-bit UMLs > happily booting on x86_64. Which kernel? I've not yet tested 2.6.20. I'll try debugging this subsequently. -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can add them to my list! Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
