> Did I send the right patch? The one I meant to send (appended below), > indeed builds and runs without utrace-regset.patch and > utrace-core.patch applied. It's utrace-1 in the following:
That is not the same patch I tried before. This one does apply and build fine (after make defconfig ARCH=um). Technically utrace_native_view doesn't belong in the tracehook patch (but in the regset one to follow it), but it is harmless. I've merged it into my current tree. You can get this via GIT if you like that. I do regular merges from Linus's GIT tree, so any upstream UML changes that merge cleanly or have trivial conflict fixes I can do will be taken care of automatically. For future updates, please send me incremental changes based on my current stuff; the GIT branches and the 2.6-current patches on my utrace web page always match up. My patch set generation uses just one fixed log message for utrace-tracehook-um.patch, so tell me if you want to adjust it from log text in today's patch. Thanks, Roland ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
