On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 09:30:56AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 12:24 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > > [ This is both 2.6.24 and -stable material ] > > > > SuSE seems to require that binaries have a .note.SuSE section. > > Without it, UML segfaults if any parameters are passed on the command > > line. > > > this sounds like something really stupid and bad... why would the kernel > need to have a per-distro note section???
I agree, what did we mess up in the SuSE kernel to require such a hack? :) thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
