Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 11:08:44AM -0400, Christopher S. Aker wrote: >> 2.6.21.1-um >> >> Mem-info: >> Normal per-cpu: >> CPU 0: Hot: hi: 90, btch: 15 usd: 14 Cold: hi: 30, btch: 7 usd: 24 >> Active:62085 inactive:6442 dirty:4693 writeback:2791 unstable:0 >> free:196 slab:3980 mapped:12235 pagetables:241 bounce:0 >> Normal free:784kB min:2208kB low:2760kB high:3312kB active:248340kB >> inactive:25768kB present:304800kB pages_scanned:1220 all_unreclaimable? no >> lowmem_reserve[]: 0 >> Normal: 0*4kB 0*8kB 1*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB >> 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 784kB >> Swap cache: add 2548, delete 2451, find 38/63, race 0+0 >> Free swap = 1037112kB >> Total swap = 1046504kB >> Free swap: 1037112kB >> 76800 pages of RAM >> 0 pages of HIGHMEM >> 2795 reserved pages >> 27381 pages shared >> 97 pages swap cached >> swapper: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x20 >> 0858ba28: [<08065c76>] dump_stack+0x22/0x26 >> 0858ba40: [<080a773f>] __alloc_pages+0x219/0x30d >> 0858ba90: [<080bb4f3>] kmem_getpages+0x22/0x80 >> 0858baa0: [<080bc2be>] cache_grow+0x166/0x180 >> 0858bad8: [<080bc41c>] cache_alloc_refill+0x144/0x1c0 >> 0858bb08: [<080bc7e3>] __kmalloc+0x6c/0x70 >> 0858bb20: [<0835f5cd>] __alloc_skb+0x55/0x104 >> 0858bb3c: [<0806b0f8>] uml_net_rx+0x38/0x161 >> 0858bb64: [<0806b26e>] uml_net_interrupt+0x32/0x76 >> 0858bb80: [<080a1297>] handle_IRQ_event+0x25/0x60 >> 0858bb9c: [<080a1324>] __do_IRQ+0x52/0xa2 >> 0858bbbc: [<080631d8>] do_IRQ+0x1f/0x32 >> 0858bbc8: [<08062d4c>] sigio_handler+0x56/0x6a >> 0858bbe0: [<08079114>] sig_handler_common_skas+0x94/0xe5 >> 0858bc04: [<08075742>] sig_handler+0x32/0x53 >> 0858bc1c: [<08077816>] hard_handler+0x1a/0x20 >> 0858bc2c: [<08450828>] __restore+0x0/0x8 >> 0858bf24: [<08064645>] default_idle+0x26/0x2f >> 0858bf38: [<08067afd>] init_idle_skas+0x28/0x2f >> 0858bf48: [<08064656>] cpu_idle+0x8/0xa >> 0858bf50: [<0806211c>] rest_init+0x2c/0x30 >> 0858bf64: [<0804876b>] start_kernel+0x1b1/0x212 >> 0858bf84: [<08067b30>] start_kernel_proc+0x2c/0x32 >> 0858bf90: [<08074f4d>] run_kernel_thread+0x50/0x57 >> 0858bfcc: [<080678a7>] new_thread_handler+0x80/0xcd >> 0858bffc: [<00000000>] nosmp+0xf7fb7f4c/0x14 >> >> Thoughts? > > The network driver failed to allocate a packet. > > How fatal was this to the UML?
It took it off the network, froze, and was unresponsive to uml_mconsole commands. User said it happened during normal usage (apt-get upgrade). -Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
