Jeff Dike schrieb: >> Hmmm... so I have cpu0 similar to yours. What version >> of UML and libc do you have? > > UML 2.6.26 and an older libc: > > % ls -l /lib/libc.so.6 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Jun 2 2007 /lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.5.so > > Looking through libc at > > http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&q=file:\.c%24+\"/stat\"+package:http://su-se.lunar-linux.org/lunar/mirrors/glibc-2.3.3-cvs-20040708.tar.bz2+show:m1O9RV1wlw4:qbkros5194A:MbxD3_8dUHU&sa=N&cd=1&ct=rc&cs_p=http://su-se.lunar-linux.org/lunar/mirrors/glibc-2.3.3-cvs-20040708.tar.bz2&cs_f=glibc-2.3.3-cvs-20040708/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/getsysstats.c > > I see it counting cpu<n> lines in /proc/stat, which is what I'm > seeing. It will also look at /proc/cpuinfo. Can you strace your > version and see if it's looking there at all?
More recent versions of glibc (here: 2.8 on Fedora 9) seem to look at the contents of /sys/devices/system/cpu instead. That directory is empty in UML, which might explain the odd result from Stanislav's program. Cheers, Ingo ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
