On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 06:22:46PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Jeff Dike<jd...@addtoit.com> wrote:
> >
> > The problem with SMP on skas0
>
> Does that mean that it works more easily on skas3?
Yup. That completely avoids ptrace issues. I think things should
just about work at that point. When you have multiple threads on
different CPUs running simultaneously, they will just switch
themselves into the appropriate address space. I can't think of any
problems with this offhand.
> > I actually had this somewhat working, but the code was a horror show,
> > with much nastiness about ignoring the signals that are needed in
> > order to prevent a detached process from running.
> >
>
> So it's probably not on the horizon any time soon then?
No - I haven't done much with UML in a while...
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
