From: Toralf Förster <toralf.foers...@gmx.de> Date: Mon, May 31, 2010 at 09:55:53AM -0400
> Borislav Petkov wrote at 22:17:38 > > LKML-Reference: <201005271944.09541.toralf.foers...@gmx.de> > > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> > > --- > > arch/um/include/asm/arch_hweight.h | 6 ++++++ > > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 arch/um/include/asm/arch_hweight.h > > > > diff --git a/arch/um/include/asm/arch_hweight.h > > b/arch/um/include/asm/arch_hweight.h > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..c656cf4 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/um/include/asm/arch_hweight.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ > > +#ifndef _ASM_UM_HWEIGHT_H > > +#define _ASM_UM_HWEIGHT_H > > + > > +#include <asm-generic/bitops/arch_hweight.h> > > + > > +#endif > > > This patch does not to solve the reported issue by me. Did you do 'make mrproper' before rebuilding UML with it? Also, can you do grep -EriIn 'x86.*hweight\.h' arch/um/ after having applied the patch? You shouldn't be getting any matches. If it still fails then, then it is something else since with this patch, UML includes the standard hweight* routines. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Operating Systems Research Center Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
