On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 19:50, richard -rw- weinberger > <richard.weinber...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven >> <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 17:22, richard -rw- weinberger >>> <richard.weinber...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven >>>> <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote: >>>>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 15:49, richard -rw- weinberger >>>>> <richard.weinber...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> Andrew, Linus, Jeff, ... anyone? >>>>>> Please apply this patch. >>>>>> >>>>>> CONFIG_STATIC_LINK is still broken. :( >>>>> >>>>> I wanted to verify Tim's patch, but after enabling CONFIG_STATIC_LINK, >>>>> it fails to link >>>>> (with or without your patch): >>>>> >>>> >>>> BTW: Does CONFIG_STATIC_LINK work for you when you revert commit >>>> 5d150a97f9391f5bcd7ba0d59d7a11c3de3cea80 (um: Clean up linker script >>>> using standard macros)? >>> >>> Still the same linking errors ;-( >>> >> >> Are you using a non-x86 environment? >> Maybe CONFIG_STATIC_LINK is more broken than i thought. > > I'm using amd64 on Ubuntu 10.04. >
Can please you test this patch? http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/03cd264b00551949?pli=1 -- Cheers, //richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
