On Sun, 22 May 2011 16:48:34 +0200
Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at> wrote:

> +static void show_segv_info(struct uml_pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +     struct task_struct *tsk = current;
> +     struct faultinfo *fi = UPT_FAULTINFO(regs);
> +
> +     if (!unhandled_signal(tsk, SIGSEGV))
> +             return;
> +
> +     if (!printk_ratelimit())
> +             return;
> +
> +     printk("%s%s[%d]: segfault at %lx ip %p sp %p error %x",
> +             task_pid_nr(tsk) > 1 ? KERN_INFO : KERN_EMERG,
> +             tsk->comm, task_pid_nr(tsk), FAULT_ADDRESS(*fi),
> +             (void *)UPT_IP(regs), (void *)UPT_SP(regs),
> +             fi->error_code);
> +
> +     print_vma_addr(KERN_CONT " in ", UPT_IP(regs));
> +     printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
> +}

Please see the nice comment in printk.h

/*
 * Please don't use printk_ratelimit(), because it shares ratelimiting state
 * with all other unrelated printk_ratelimit() callsites.  Instead use
 * printk_ratelimited() or plain old __ratelimit().
 */

I thought we had a checkpatch rule for this but apparently I dreamed
it.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, 
you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
Download your free trial now. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Reply via email to