Hi, On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:14, Russell King - ARM Linux > <li...@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 12:09:02PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:36, Russell King - ARM Linux >>> <li...@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: >>> > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 06:14:38PM +0200, Zoltan Devai wrote: >>> >> Commit 592913ecb87a9e06f98ddb55b298f1a66bf94c6b has killed off any >>> >> use of this config option long ago. >>> > >>> > I don't see the point of this - we were free of GENERIC_TIME on ARM >>> > shortly after it was originally killed off. The problem is you can't >>> > stop people introducing new uses of this - because it existed once and >>> > there's nothing which errors out on its presence, people are going to >>> > continue submitting patches with it in. And it's going to continue >>> > being missed at the review stage. >>> > >>> > I've a similar problem with folk on ARM including mach/gpio.h as their >>> > sole gpio header file rather than linux/gpio.h - I've been trying for >>> > the last 1-2 years to educate people to use linux/ in preference. You >>> > can't do it, and I'm still just about the only one who picks up on that. >>> > (SoC maintainers don't care.) They will end up caring when I push a >>> > change during the next merge window though, so I'll eventually stop >>> > mach/gpio.h being included. (Instead, it'll be asm/gpio.h). >>> > >>> > GENERIC_TIME though... I don't think you'll ever stop new uses of it >>> > creeping in unless you can arrange for something to error out. >>> >>> Doesn't kconf error out when trying to select a non-existent symbol? >> >> Nope. > > You're right. So that's a bug. > depends on what you are trying to achieve and what the problem is.
Internally kconfig will create a dummy symbol when it encounter a missing symbol so that arch/arm/Kconfig can reference a symbol which will be fully defined later on. I do not think you want to forward decl all the symbol which can be used. That'd be a mess. That said, we can come with a form of symbol deprecation that would error-out when used. - Arnaud ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got Input? Slashdot Needs You. Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often. Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek. http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
