On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> And it's not cheap - doing that on each syscall will be unpleasant...
> Frankly, I'd rather stopped telling the uml userland about vdso in such
> setups. And anything that plays with SYSCALL outside of vdso... <shrug>
> we already have a "don't run it native on 32bit", adding "don't run
> it on 32bit uml on amd64 host" is not too serious. At least for now...
I do agree that the solution might well be to just stop using the
non-int80 vdsos for UML. That may just solve everything in practice.
Linus
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system,
user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take
the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the
tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-d2d-2
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
