From: Al Viro <v...@ftp.linux.org.uk>

tty->count is decremented only after ->close() had been called and several
tasks can hit it in parallel.  As the result, using tty->count to check if
you are the last one is broken.  We end up leaving line->tty not reset to
NULL and the next IRQ on that sucker will blow up trying to dereference
pointers from kfree'd struct tty.

Fix is obvious: we need to use a counter of our own.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at>
---
 arch/um/drivers/line.c        |   25 ++++++++++++-------------
 arch/um/include/shared/line.h |    1 +
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/line.c b/arch/um/drivers/line.c
index d51c404..c5bff1d 100644
--- a/arch/um/drivers/line.c
+++ b/arch/um/drivers/line.c
@@ -399,8 +399,8 @@ int line_setup_irq(int fd, int input, int output, struct 
line *line, void *data)
  * is done under a spinlock.  Checking whether the device is in use is
  * line->tty->count > 1, also under the spinlock.
  *
- * tty->count serves to decide whether the device should be enabled or
- * disabled on the host.  If it's equal to 1, then we are doing the
+ * line->count serves to decide whether the device should be enabled or
+ * disabled on the host.  If it's equal to 0, then we are doing the
  * first open or last close.  Otherwise, open and close just return.
  */
 
@@ -414,16 +414,16 @@ int line_open(struct line *lines, struct tty_struct *tty)
                goto out_unlock;
 
        err = 0;
-       if (tty->count > 1)
+       if (line->count++)
                goto out_unlock;
 
-       spin_unlock(&line->count_lock);
-
+       BUG_ON(tty->driver_data);
        tty->driver_data = line;
        line->tty = tty;
 
+       spin_unlock(&line->count_lock);
        err = enable_chan(line);
-       if (err)
+       if (err) /* line_close() will be called by our caller */
                return err;
 
        INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&line->task, line_timer_cb);
@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ int line_open(struct line *lines, struct tty_struct *tty)
        chan_window_size(&line->chan_list, &tty->winsize.ws_row,
                         &tty->winsize.ws_col);
 
-       return err;
+       return 0;
 
 out_unlock:
        spin_unlock(&line->count_lock);
@@ -460,17 +460,16 @@ void line_close(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file * 
filp)
        flush_buffer(line);
 
        spin_lock(&line->count_lock);
-       if (!line->valid)
-               goto out_unlock;
+       BUG_ON(!line->valid);
 
-       if (tty->count > 1)
+       if (--line->count)
                goto out_unlock;
 
-       spin_unlock(&line->count_lock);
-
        line->tty = NULL;
        tty->driver_data = NULL;
 
+       spin_unlock(&line->count_lock);
+
        if (line->sigio) {
                unregister_winch(tty);
                line->sigio = 0;
@@ -498,7 +497,7 @@ static int setup_one_line(struct line *lines, int n, char 
*init, int init_prio,
 
        spin_lock(&line->count_lock);
 
-       if (line->tty != NULL) {
+       if (line->count) {
                *error_out = "Device is already open";
                goto out;
        }
diff --git a/arch/um/include/shared/line.h b/arch/um/include/shared/line.h
index 72f4f25..63df3ca 100644
--- a/arch/um/include/shared/line.h
+++ b/arch/um/include/shared/line.h
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ struct line_driver {
 struct line {
        struct tty_struct *tty;
        spinlock_t count_lock;
+       unsigned long count;
        int valid;
 
        char *init_str;
-- 
1.7.6.1


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K
The only unified storage solution that offers unified management 
Up to 160% more powerful than alternatives and 25% more efficient. 
Guaranteed. http://p.sf.net/sfu/emc-vnx-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Reply via email to