Hi Richard, On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:19:25 +0200 Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at> wrote: > > Instead of having one defconfig for both i386 and x86_64 > we have now two. > This is the first step to get rid of SUBARCH. > > This patch is based on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/4/396 > > Cc: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artag...@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at> > --- > arch/um/configs/i386_defconfig | 954 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/um/configs/x86_64_defconfig | 943 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 1897 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 arch/um/configs/i386_defconfig > create mode 100644 arch/um/configs/x86_64_defconfig
Can these still work if put through "make savedefconfig" like other architectures defconfig files? I did a test and they produce files that are only 74-75 lines long and the resulting files produced the same .config when used in place of their originals. But I only did that test on an X86_64 host, so I just don't know if there is some strangeness of um that would stop us using them. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
pgpaqGY_MJ7Jw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights, analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management. Visit us today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
