Am 18.07.2014 12:14, schrieb Will Deacon: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 03:47:26PM +0100, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> wrote: >>> The core mm code will provide a default gate area based on >>> FIXADDR_USER_START and FIXADDR_USER_END if >>> !defined(__HAVE_ARCH_GATE_AREA) && defined(AT_SYSINFO_EHDR). >>> >>> This default is only useful for ia64. arm64, ppc, s390, sh, tile, >>> 64-bit UML, and x86_32 have their own code just to disable it. arm, >>> 32-bit UML, and x86_64 have gate areas, but they have their own >>> implementations. >>> >>> This gets rid of the default and moves the code into ia64. >>> >>> This should save some code on architectures without a gate area: it's >>> now possible to inline the gate_area functions in the default case. >> >> Can one of you pull this somewhere? Otherwise I can put it somewhere >> stable and ask for -next inclusion, but that seems like overkill for a >> single patch.
For the um bits: Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at> > I'd be happy to take the arm64 part, but it doesn't feel right for mm/* > changes (or changes to other archs) to go via our tree. > > I'm not sure what the best approach is if you want to send this via a single > tree. Maybe you could ask akpm nicely? Going though Andrew's tree sounds sane to me. Thanks, //richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
