On 10/09/2014 03:32 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Mon 2014-10-06 22:28:05, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> Poweroff handlers may now be installed with register_poweroff_handler. >> Use the new API function have_kernel_poweroff to determine if a poweroff >> handler has been installed. >> >> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@rjwysocki.net> >> Cc: Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz> >> Cc: Len Brown <len.br...@intel.com> >> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> >> --- >> kernel/power/hibernate.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/kernel/power/hibernate.c b/kernel/power/hibernate.c >> index a9dfa79..20353c5 100644 >> --- a/kernel/power/hibernate.c >> +++ b/kernel/power/hibernate.c >> @@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ static void power_down(void) >> case HIBERNATION_PLATFORM: >> hibernation_platform_enter(); >> case HIBERNATION_SHUTDOWN: >> - if (pm_power_off) >> + if (have_kernel_poweroff()) >> kernel_power_off(); >> break; > > poweroff -> power_off. > As mentioned in my other reply, that was on purpose to distinguish existing functions from poweroff handler functions.
> But if you are playing with this, anyway... does it make sense to > introduce kernel_power_off() that just works, no need to check > have_..? > Pavel I am trying not to change existing behavior. kernel_power_off is an existing function which does some cleanup before calling machine_power_off which in turn calls do_kernel_poweroff (or currently pm_power_off and may do some other machine specific stuff. Sure, poweroff handling could be unified further. We could decide to enter an endless loop if machine_power_off() returns, or we could decide to dump a warning or panic in this case. But that is all separate from the issue I am trying to solve here, which is to provide a capability to register more than one poweroff handler. It would also not be that simple, since some architectures call machine_power_off() directly from various places. Guenter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel