Am 03.03.2015 um 10:26 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at> wrote: >> Am 03.03.2015 um 09:39 schrieb Lorenzo Colitti: >>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Richard Weinberger >>> <richard.weinber...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> IIRC the big plan is to make tracehook_report_syscall_entry() tree-wide >>>> void. >>> >>> Ack, thanks. In the meantime, for trees we already build with -Werror, >>> we'll put a temporary local hack in place. >> >> As long GCC has a shitload of completely useless warnings building with >> -Werror >> is just a PITA. That's why Linux does not use that flag. :-) > > For some classes of warnings yet. > > For this particular case, given the tree-wide void plan, it can easily be > resolved by dropping the __must_check attribute from > tracehook_report_syscall_entry() now.
Yep. Currently I'm searching the archives for that plan. I was about to fix that warning a few months ago but I was told that is not needed... Thanks, //richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
