Am 09.01.2016 um 04:51 schrieb Al Viro: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 09:51:43AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> If get_signal() returns us a signal to post >> we must not call it again, otherwise the already >> posted signal will be overridden. >> Before commit a610d6e672d this was the case as we stopped >> the while after a successful handle_signal(). > > Old behaviour had been wrong. If you have several pending signals, > more than one sigframe should be built, as if the second, etc. had > been delivered right on the entry into the handler. > > Stopping after the first one is obviously wrong - consider the case > when attempt to deliver it has raised SIGSEGV.
You are right. Thanks for pointing this out. Will revert. Thanks, //richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
