Am 26.01.2016 um 01:15 schrieb Paul Bolle: > On ma, 2016-01-25 at 23:24 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/Kconfig > >> config INV_MPU6050_IIO >> tristate "Invensense MPU6050 devices" >> depends on I2C && SYSFS >> + depends on I2C_MUX > > Nit: if I parsed the v4.5-rc1 tree correctly I2C_MUX depends I2C. So > just > depends on I2C_MUX && SYSFS > > should also do the trick. Is it clearer to mention both I2C and I2C_MUX > explicitly?
I don't have a strong opinion on that. In general I'm a fan of explicit dependencies but in this case, you are right, also an implicit one should to it. Let's see what maintainers think. :-) Thanks, //richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
