On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Thomas Meyer <tho...@m3y3r.de> wrote: >> On Tue, 16 May 2017 17:46:47 +0200 >> Thomas Meyer <tho...@m3y3r.de> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> as far as I understand everything under os-Linux should be OS specific >>> and shouldn't rely on kernel functions. >> >> I see, but umid.c already uses many printk()s. So that policy >> is not so clear now. For example, without this series, > > Yes you are right. I did write nonsense! > > I'm fine with all patches in series. Looks good to me!
Yeah, the policy is not so clear. In theory os-Linux should contain no kernel stuff, but the printk()s do not hurt, in most cases. -- Thanks, //richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
