> Am 21.05.2017 um 23:28 schrieb Richard Weinberger > <richard.weinber...@gmail.com>: > > Thomas, > >> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:11 AM, Thomas Meyer <tho...@m3y3r.de> wrote: >> This is actually a no-op as all read-only should be read-only in the ELF. > > What problem does this patch fix? Or what is the purpose?
Hi, It's purely cosmetic; to get rid of the boot message: "This architecture does not have kernel memory protection." in init/main.c Which isn't true for UML as all read only stuff should end up in a read only ELF section. Shouldn't it? > > -- > Thanks, > //richard > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > User-mode-linux-devel mailing list > User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
