On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 11:08:17PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote: > Would you rate hostfs as more or less secure than NFS ?
Depends on your point of view, but I'd say hostfs is less secure. By definition, you're giving a UML process access to the host in this scenario, which seems less than airtight. A well-secured NFS implementation running inside UML would seem to be a more secure alternative, at least from the host system's point of view. YMMV. -- Find my Techno-Geek Journal at http://www.codegnome.org/geeklog/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
