On Wednesday 09 March 2005 18:26, Nuutti Kotivuori wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 March 2005 16:04, Nuutti Kotivuori wrote: > >> I am wondering what are the memory limits for a single UML guest > >> kernel of 2.6.9-bs7? We are running to some sort of problem just > >> below 500 megabytes already. > > > > Hmm, in both 2.6.9-bs7 and 2.6.11 the limit is at least 768M, and it > > extends to more than 2G with static linking and without TT > > mode. This is all without HIGHMEM support. > > The kernels seem to be statically linked by default (or atleast our > binaries are). For TT mode dynamic linking is not possible. > So removing TT mode has beneficial effects if running > only on SKAS? Yes, remember however to enable STATIC linking explicitly. > Are there any others, except the memory limit raise? I don't know... it would be slightly faster and lighter but I doubt it will be measurable. > > Retest also with 2.6.11, it feels a better tree than 2.6.9-bs7. I'm also not sure that 2.6.9-bs7 will compile & work with this config - 2.6.11 should compile and work well, instead, even with STATIC_LINK && ! TT_MODE. > Okay, will do.
-- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user