On Wednesday 09 March 2005 18:26, Nuutti Kotivuori wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Wednesday 09 March 2005 16:04, Nuutti Kotivuori wrote:
> >> I am wondering what are the memory limits for a single UML guest
> >> kernel of 2.6.9-bs7? We are running to some sort of problem just
> >> below 500 megabytes already.
> >
> > Hmm, in both 2.6.9-bs7 and 2.6.11 the limit is at least 768M, and it
> > extends to more than 2G with static linking and without TT
> > mode. This is all without HIGHMEM support.
>
> The kernels seem to be statically linked by default (or atleast our
> binaries are).
For TT mode dynamic linking is not possible.
> So removing TT mode has beneficial effects if running 
> only on SKAS?
Yes, remember however to enable STATIC linking explicitly.
> Are there any others, except the memory limit raise? 
I don't know... it would be slightly faster and lighter but I doubt it will be 
measurable.
> > Retest also with 2.6.11, it feels a better tree than 2.6.9-bs7.
I'm also not sure that 2.6.9-bs7 will compile & work with this config - 2.6.11 
should compile and work well, instead, even with STATIC_LINK && ! TT_MODE.
> Okay, will do.

-- 
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade




-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-user mailing list
User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user

Reply via email to