> Revert the fork-not-clone patch:
>       http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0506.1/0665.html
> 

Tried to revert the patch, but it did not succeed from 2.6.12 (Woozy
Numbat). Maybe I should revert an other patch before (An other solution
would be to put the changes in by hand....)? 

Following output: 

[...]$ patch -RNp1 -i ../UML_fork-instead_of_clone_patch
patching file arch/um/kernel/process.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 130 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 159.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 180.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 188.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 204.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 234.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 257.
Hunk #8 FAILED at 265.
Hunk #9 FAILED at 290.
Hunk #10 FAILED at 301.
Hunk #11 FAILED at 339.
Hunk #12 FAILED at 371.
Hunk #13 FAILED at 390.
12 out of 13 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
arch/um/kernel/process.c.rej
[...]

Trying again 2.6.12.rc4 ...


PS: I do not know how long it takes that I send my mails as reply to
all... Sorry. 



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-user mailing list
User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user

Reply via email to