On Friday 24 June 2005 15:41, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 02:02:24PM +0200, Bernhard Schauer wrote:
> > Checking for host processor xmm support...No
> > Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...<0>Kernel panic -
> > not syncing: Segfault with no mm
>
> Revert the fork-not-clone patch:
>       http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0506.1/0665.html
>
> The patch isn't wrong exactly - as far as I can see, the compiler is
> compiling it slightly differently so that it hits the tt mode vs new libc
> errno incompatibility.
Ok, can you describe it a bit more detailedly?

Also, are you going to drop this patch (or allow me to do this) for now? Since 
it isn't getting fixed, it seems me a good idea.
-- 
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade

        

        
                
___________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB 
http://mail.yahoo.it



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-user mailing list
User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user

Reply via email to