On Friday 07 October 2005 22:00, Nosorozec wrote: > Hello, > the newest patch for guest kernel (uml-2.6.13-bs3) has some problem with > kernel 2.6.13.3:
> +---+ > patching file arch/um/kernel/skas/include/mmu-skas.h > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] > +--+ > > this patch (uml-2.6.13-bs3) works perfectly well for main 2.6.13 (and > also for 2.6.13.1 and 2.6.13.2) kernel. So my question is: is it any > rule that bs-patches should be use only with main kernels (2.6.X)?, or > it simply depends ... Normally not. The culprit patch is uml-fix-x86-64-page-leak, which was also merged in -stable series (not everybody uses -bs, so I try to -stable the most critical fixes). Just take it from the broken-out folder on the archives, unapply it (patch -p1 -R < ...) and apply the patchset. Anyway, -bs4 will be based on 2.6.13.3, exactly for this reason. > Rgds, > Nosorozec -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger: chiamate gratuite in tutto il mondo http://it.messenger.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
