On Wednesday 26 July 2006 15:00, Samuel Korpi wrote: > On 7/26/06, Samuel Korpi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/13/06, Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Instead of the patch mentioned earlier, you might also try the one > > > below - it depends on klibc, so you need to apply it to a recent -mm > > > UML. I'm thinking about sending this to Andrew, despite it's > > > nastinesses. > > > > > > It applies on top of (and backs out) the other jmpbuf patch. > > > > Is there any drawbacks in applying this directly on top of a pure > > vanilla kernel (2.6.17.7) or do I need to apply the other jmpbuf patch > > before this one? > > Well, it didn't work in any case. Just says > > patching file arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c > patch: **** malformed patch at line 5: --- 6,5 ---- The patch was mangled by some email program - it was published as "[uml-devel] [PATCH 2/7] UML - Use klibc setjmp/longjmp", download it from the uml-devel archive on marc.theaimsgroup.com (use the "save as plain text" link); probably you could redownload the mail you got from this archive, it's likely your mail agent corrupted it.
> So, what would be the proper way (i.e. the recommended patch) to get > rid of the jmpbuf problem? > /Samuel -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user