On Wednesday 26 July 2006 15:00, Samuel Korpi wrote:
> On 7/26/06, Samuel Korpi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/13/06, Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Instead of the patch mentioned earlier, you might also try the one
> > > below - it depends on klibc, so you need to apply it to a recent -mm
> > > UML.  I'm thinking about sending this to Andrew, despite it's
> > > nastinesses.
> > >
> > > It applies on top of (and backs out) the other jmpbuf patch.
> >
> > Is there any drawbacks in applying this directly on top of a pure
> > vanilla kernel (2.6.17.7) or do I need to apply the other jmpbuf patch
> > before this one?
>
> Well, it didn't work in any case. Just says
>
> patching file arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c
> patch: **** malformed patch at line 5: --- 6,5 ----
The patch was mangled by some email program - it was published as "[uml-devel] 
[PATCH 2/7] UML - Use klibc setjmp/longjmp", download it from the uml-devel 
archive on marc.theaimsgroup.com (use the "save as plain text" link); 
probably you could redownload the mail you got from this archive, it's likely 
your mail agent corrupted it.

> So, what would be the proper way (i.e. the recommended patch) to get
> rid of the jmpbuf problem?

> /Samuel

-- 
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! 
 http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-user mailing list
User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user

Reply via email to