On Tuesday 28 November 2006 00:30, Buggy Code wrote: > Hi > > Just the thought having a 300G UML file system seems to a bit scary for us > > Gerhard
> I personally > found nfs to be > relatively slow (this may be due to nfs configuration settings) and hostfs > much seems much faster I remember people posting benchmarks (or impressions) that the opposite was true - however on big files hostfs is likely to be faster than NFS, on little to medium ones I expect the opposite to hold. Humfs and the new hostfs coming along with it should be faster than the current code, however (I'm thinking to the better cache usage). -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can add them to my list! Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
