On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:28:49 -0400
Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 02:31:23PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
> > The above patch contains Ingo's, Al's and my patch. And Ingo's is merged in
> > commit b15136e9497ef5d6e08cf665e0d0acf7a229f6dc, mine is merged in commit
> > 23464ffa47689e46985fb10ae9e34bbc9e83f387. So I just need to apply Al's
> > patch manually.
> >
> > But after applying Al's patch, the core dump still occured, just as
> > mentioned before. Backtrace is also the same. Any other ideas?
>
> You should do what I said, because your description of that patch is
> wrong. It contains the pieces you described, plus a fix of mine which
> fixes the bug you're hitting. That piece is what I attached to the
> bottom of my mail, which you ignored.
Sorry, Jeff. I didn't notice your patch. ;(
After adding your patch, uml works very fine. I am enjoying it.
Thank you!
--
May the Source Be With You.
__________________________________________________
¸Ï¿ì×¢²áÑÅ»¢³¬´óÈÝÁ¿Ãâ·ÑÓÊÏä?
http://cn.mail.yahoo.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-user mailing list
User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
