好的，按照大家的意见统一对“Data Source”和“Data Sink”不翻译。
在 2019-08-14 05:19:13，"Yu Li" <[email protected]> 写道： >支持不翻译而在专有名词表中增加注释。 > >从现有Flink翻译规范中的“术语表”来看，对于某些专有名词也是不翻译而只解释含义的，比如checkpoint。对于Data Source和Data >Sink也建议采用同样的处理方式。 > >PS. 这个是关于中文翻译的讨论，不太适合发到@dev邮件列表，希望大家能将讨论范围限定在中文邮件列表内，谢谢！ > >Best Regards, >Yu > > >On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 15:02, WangHengwei <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 我觉得《计算机科学技术名词》这个很有用，谢谢。 >> >> >> >> Flink 翻译规范 [ >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Translation+Specifications >> ] 中有一些 Flink 专有名词的翻译规范，例如“State”翻译成“状态”，还有各种时间窗口，以及我们会把“Event”翻译成“事件”。 >> >> >> 晦涩或者非常专用的词汇不做翻译比较合适，例如”State >> Backend“。但是如果可以找到比较优雅的中文词汇能够清晰代表含义的话，翻译过来有助于更好地理解，如果我们对于专有名词建立一个统一的译法就不会造成混乱，所以很想征求大家的意见。 >> >> >> “Data Source”翻译成数据源感觉比较通顺，而我在翻译时遇到很多与其相对的“Data >> Sink“，从翻译者和阅读者的角度体会，如果翻译前者而不翻译后者感觉有些不一致。至少应该保持二者同时翻译或者不翻。 >> >> >> 想再听听大家的建议，非常感谢大家的回复。 >> >> 在 2019-08-13 18:58:40，"Zili Chen" <[email protected]> 写道： >> >Source 和 Sink 的通译是 源 和 汇，data source 和 data sink 因此分别对应 数据源 和 >> >数据汇。出处可参见中国计算机协会的《计算机科学技术名词》，线上检索在这里[1] >> > >> >但是具体到 FLINK 的情况，实际上我建议所有 FLINK 专有名词都不要翻译，翻译反而增加理解难度。 >> > >> >Best, >> >tison. >> >[1] http://www.termonline.cn/index.htm >> > >> > >> >hsw <[email protected]> 于2019年8月13日周二 下午6:46写道： >> > >> >> 赞同，想了半天没想到合适的中文翻译data sink >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> 发件人：Jeff Zhang<[email protected]> >> >> 日 期：2019年08月13日 18:20:34 >> >> 收件人：<[email protected]> >> >> 抄 送：[email protected]<[email protected]>; dev<[email protected]> >> >> 主 题：Re: [Discuss] What should the "Data Source" be translated into >> Chinese >> >> >> >> 不建议翻译 >> >> >> >> Simon Su <[email protected]> 于2019年8月13日周二 下午6:18写道： >> >> >> >> > 更倾向不去翻译Data Source和Data Sink, 通过用中文对其做解释即可 >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > SImon >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On 08/13/2019 18:07，<[email protected]> wrote： >> >> > How about translate "data sink" into “数据漕” >> >> > 漕，读作：cáo。汉字基本字义指通过水道运输粮食：漕运|漕粮。==> >> >> > https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E6%BC%95?forcehttps=1%3Ffr%3Dkg_hanyu >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > ----- 原始邮件 ----- >> >> > 发件人：Kurt Young <[email protected]> >> >> > 收件人：dev <[email protected]>, user-zh <[email protected]> >> >> > 主题：Re: [Discuss] What should the "Data Source" be translated into >> Chinese >> >> > 日期：2019年08月13日 16点44分 >> >> > >> >> > cc user-zh mailing list, since there are lots of chinese speaking >> people. >> >> > Best, >> >> > Kurt >> >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 4:02 PM WangHengwei <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi all, >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > I'm working on [FLINK-13405] Translate "Basic API Concepts" page into >> >> > Chinese. I have a problem. >> >> > >> >> > Usually we translate "Data Source" into "数据源" but there is no agreed >> >> > translation for "Data Sink". Since it often appears in documents, I >> think >> >> > we'd better to have a unified translation. I have some alternatives, >> e.g. >> >> > "数据沉淀","数据归" or "数据终". >> >> > >> >> > Committer Xingcan Cui has a good suggestion for "数据汇" which >> >> > corresponds to source ("数据源"). I asked Committer Jark Wu, he is also >> fine >> >> > with it. I think "数据汇" is a good representation of flow >> charactiristics >> >> so >> >> > I would like to use it. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > I want to hear more thoughts from the community whether we should >> >> > translate it and what it should be translated into. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > WangHW >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Best Regards >> >> >> >> Jeff Zhang >> >> >> >> >>
