On Monday, July 9, 2012 1:14:09 PM, "John Armstrong" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 07/09/2012 01:00 PM, John Vines wrote: > > We have an open bug report about how Mock handles the reuse of > > Values. > > I'm wondering if perhaps there is a conflict there with BatchScanner > > in > > the same vain. More likely though, it's probably a case of > > BatchScanner > > behaving like a Scanner in Mock due to the non-distributed nature of > > Mock. I'm not really sure how we could expand the MockAccumulo > > framework > > to be MockParallel though. > > Okay, I understand if that's hard to get exactly the same behavior in > mock and production environments. But is the behavior I'm seeing in > production the expected one?
That does seem unusual. Adam and Keith are looking into it. Billie
