I would hope that Accumulo developers aspire to a higher level of security awareness. :)
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Corey Nolet <[email protected]> wrote: > Hadoop & Zookeeper put that information at the INFO level the their logs > don't they? > > On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:41 PM, David Medinets wrote: > >> I was thinking that someone might not want hostname and port >> information in log files for security reasons. By putting the >> 'sensitive' information in a DEBUG message instead of an WARNING >> message the level of exposure can be controlled by log4j. Perhaps a >> non-issue, but with these days of consolidating log files into one >> location for analysis using two messages does provide a bit of cover >> when talking security. >> >> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Adam Fuchs <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Sounds like a good upgrade to me. Could even be done as part of that warning >>> message. >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:28 PM, David Medinets <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I am seeing the following output in my monitor_lasho.log file. Would >>>> it be possible to display the host and port that is being displayed as >>>> a DEBUG level message? >
