Here's some Java code to do just that:
public void removeVersioningIterator(String tableName) throws
TableNotFoundException, CBSecurityException, CBException {
Iterable<Map.Entry<String, String>> properties =
connector.tableOperations().getProperties(tableName);
List<String> versioningIteratorPropertyNames = Arrays.asList(
"table.iterator.majc.vers",
"table.iterator.majc.vers.opt.maxVersions",
"table.iterator.minc.vers",
"table.iterator.minc.vers.opt.maxVersions",
"table.iterator.scan.vers",
"table.iterator.scan.vers.opt.maxVersions"
);
for (String propertyName : versioningIteratorPropertyNames) {
for (Map.Entry<String, String> tableProperty : properties) {
if (tableProperty.getKey().equals(propertyName)) {
connector.tableOperations().removeProperty(tableName,
propertyName);
break;
}
}
}
}
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:43 PM, William Slacum <
[email protected]> wrote:
> I think you'll probably have to have modify the table configuration since
> the VersioningIterator is applied by default at level 20.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:35 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> You can use the VersioningIterator within your scanner and specify the
>> number of versions (i.e. timestamps) you want. Or you can use the
>> TimeStampFilter and specify the time range for the rows you want. Or use
>> no iterators at all and let the scanner give you ALL rows. ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* Sami Omer [mailto:[email protected]]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 18, 2012 12:25
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* making Scanner iterate through different version of cell****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Hello everyone,****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Is there a way to programmatically iterate through the different version
>> of a cell (cells that have identical row id, column family, and column
>> qualifier but different timestamps) in Accumulo 1.3.6?****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> I was looking over the documentation and saw that those settings can be
>> applied per table through the command line, but is it doable via the API?
>> ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Thank you.****
>>
>
>
--
John Stoneham
[email protected]
