Can you run a performance test between the two options? What amount of data is being stored? What is the size of the rows? There are so many variables.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Roshan Punnoose <[email protected]> wrote: > Is it more performant to have multiple tables for different sets of data, or > would having a properly split table into tablets have the same or better > performance. > > I am storing data in three tables, but I was wondering if putting all that > data into one table, with a row prefix, would have better performance. Thanks! > > Roshan Punnoose > [email protected] > > >
