The developers are flushing their BatchWriter.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Keith Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Terry P. <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Greetings all, >> For a growing table that currently from zero to 70 million entries this >> weekend, I'm seeing 4.4 million entries still in memory, though the client >> programs are supposed to be flushing their entries. >> > > Are you flushing the batch writer or the table? > > >> >> Is there a server-side setting to help reduce the number of entries that >> are in memory (not yet flushed to disk)? Our system has fairly light >> performance requirements, so I'm okay if a tweak may result in reduced >> ingest performance. >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Terry >> > >
